Its agent spots renewal risk
It connects account value, renewal date, sales activity, and support signals.
Collaborative implementation service for teams
In 8 weeks, Web Igniter turns one critical process into a shared, governed, measurable system. Each person keeps their view, each agent knows its role, and everyone works from the same current state.
A complete engagement with a Go or No-Go decision at the end of week 2. The standard scope covers one process, one pilot team, and one measurable outcome.

The outcome is not another agent. It is a shared process that keeps working when the session, person, or model changes.
Sales, delivery, and finance ask different questions. Their agents still use the same clients, commitments, incidents, deadlines, and evidence, with permissions adapted to each role.
It connects account value, renewal date, sales activity, and support signals.
It connects milestones, budget, incidents, dependencies, and open commitments.
It connects invoices, disputes, delivery delays, and documented ownership.
Business objects, relationships, rules, states, decisions, and evidence form a common, governed, inspectable context.
When information changes, the team no longer synchronizes three competing stories. The change becomes visible in each role's authorized context.
The right starting point depends on how many people and agents must interact directly with operational memory.
One person and one agent test a question, method, and first business model locally on SQLite.
Ideal for a fast, controlled proof.Several people use one intermediary agent. This can be enough for a shared pilot without separate identities in the Brain.
Useful before opening direct access.Several people and agents access shared PostgreSQL memory directly, with roles, permissions, and governance.
The level targeted by mindBrain Team Launch.Collaboration becomes reliable when the foundation is shared and access stays proportionate to each role.
Clients, projects, contracts, incidents, and decisions keep one identity across teams.
Each person and agent receives the facts, indicators, and next actions useful to its responsibility.
Reading, proposing, writing, and approving are configured separately according to operational risk.
An authorized update enriches the shared reality and remains traceable for the other relevant actors.
A costly operational question reveals the people, data, rules, and decisions that must meet. It also creates a testable project outcome.
Sales
Delivery
Finance
Tenders
One transformation, three decision thresholds to limit risk.
Scope the process, establish the starting state, and validate the model on a reduced perimeter.
Promote the proof into mindBrain Pro, configure access, agents, integrations, and approvals.
Maintain the system with BrainOps Care or connect other teams and domains on the mindBrain Enterprise path.
The week 2 Go or No-Go confirms feasibility and scope before production is built.
The engagement covers 8 weeks. The week 2 Go or No-Go avoids building production on an unverified assumption.
Turn one costly question into a testable scope.
Validate context, method, and first action on a controlled scope.
Promote the validated case to mindBrain Pro and mindBrain Team.
Run the process in real work and prepare its operation.
Standard mindBrain Team Launch scope
The scope stays legible so price, schedule, and responsibilities can be assessed before commitment.
One operational question, domain, starting state, actors, rules, exceptions, and acceptance criteria.
A Personal Proof showing that a fresh session retrieves context, follows the method, and produces a useful action.
One mindBrain Team on mindBrain Pro for a pilot team, with shared memory, role views, permissions, and audit.
Up to 2 configured agents and up to 2 priority integrations in the standard scope.
Tests, pilot team training, documentation, runbook, and human handover criteria.
Contracted exports, a 90-day roadmap, and 30 days of hypercare after launch.
User count, hosting mode, Pro license, and special requirements are detailed in the proposal after technical qualification.
Ten tests cover continuity, action, collaboration, and control. Their details are adapted to the process during scoping.
Resume the case without a long manual rebrief.
Retrieve the expected objects and events.
Respect the agreed steps, rules, and exceptions.
Prepare or execute an authorized operation.
Block or request approval at the right threshold.
Link a recommendation to its facts and rules.
Give a person the state and next decision.
Pass the case between roles without losing context.
Reflect a change in authorized views.
Find who viewed, proposed, approved, or changed the case.
The goal is not to promise an autonomous company. It is to make one shared process faster, more reliable, and more explainable.
Shared memory reduces coordination cost without erasing responsibility.
Exact choices depend on your constraints, systems, and hosting mode. The proposal separates what is included, configurable, quoted separately, or dependent on a third party.
Location, target environment, and operating responsibilities are documented after technical qualification.
ConfigurableRead, propose, write, and approve rights are defined for the pilot scope.
IncludedCovered operations and required trace level are defined with acceptance criteria.
IncludedFrequency, retention, ownership, and restore tests depend on the selected operating mode.
To defineThe model may change without becoming business memory. Providers and costs are qualified separately.
ConfigurableContracted models, configurations, exports, documents, and procedures are handed over.
IncludedExit, migration, and assistance conditions are described in the final proposal.
Quoted separatelyThis scenario shows the intended operation. It is not a published client outcome and claims no quantified gain.
Sales, delivery, and finance query the same account with different views. Every step keeps its source and owner.
Its agent detects a near renewal, low activity, and several support signals.
Its agent links a late milestone and an open commitment without exposing unauthorized financial data.
Its agent confirms a disputed invoice and requests approval before any sensitive action.
The action plan, owners, evidence, and next deadline remain available in the shared case.

One shared process. A team to put it to work.
Illustrative atmosphere photography.mindBrain Team Launch engagement
The final amount depends on the process, sources, integrations, hosting, and governance requirements. A proposal defines scope after qualification.
Assess my processA successful launch creates a maintained operational base, not an invitation to multiply scope without evidence.
Maintain, monitor, and improve the mindBrain Team process with a clear change path.
Add a new process or source after the first outcome and operating cost are understood.
Connect additional teams and domains with explicit governance and ownership.
A good launch needs a recurring problem, a business owner, and criteria the team agrees to verify.
If the case remains individual or exploratory, Personal or the Bootcamp is often the better first step.
These answers explain the operating model without turning the page into a technical contract.
No. It gives compatible assistants shared context, role-specific permissions, and controlled operations around one process.
No. mindBrain Team structures objects, relationships, decisions, rules, states, and evidence that agents can use within permissions.
Yes. Personal is the recommended proof layer. Direct multi-user collaboration targets mindBrain Pro and mindBrain Team.
The standard scope covers one clearly bounded process, one operational question, one domain, and one pilot team.
Only integrations agreed during qualification and listed in the proposal are included. Third-party availability remains outside our control.
Hosting, location, and operating responsibilities are selected and documented during technical qualification.
Only within configured permissions. Sensitive operations can remain prepared and pending approval.
The service ends with handover and hypercare. BrainOps Care or a new scoped extension can follow if useful.
Additional scope, third-party usage, hosting, special compliance, and ongoing operations outside the standard are quoted separately.
Yes. The agreed exports, documentation, and operating responsibilities are handed over so the team can decide its next step.
Tick the criteria that are already true today. The check runs in your browser and sends no data.
The conversation confirms a starting point and first recommendation. It does not replace scoping or a technical proposal.